Search

Sacklers and Purdue Reach Settlement as Opioids Crisis Continues - The New York Times

erotoko.blogspot.com

The agreement brought holdout states on board, and would settle thousands of lawsuits over the company’s and family’s roles in the opioid epidemic. The Sacklers agreed to pay an extra billion dollars.

Members of the billionaire Sackler family and their company, Purdue Pharma, have reached a deal with a group of states that had long resisted the company’s bankruptcy plan, opening the way for billions of dollars to begin flowing to addiction treatment programs nationwide, according to a court filing Thursday.

If Judge Robert Drain, who has presided over the bankruptcy proceedings in White Plains, N.Y., approves the agreement, the Sacklers will pay as much as $6 billion to help communities address the damages wrought by the opioid crisis.

In return, family members will get the prize they had insisted upon for nearly three years: an end to all current and future civil claims against them over the company’s prescription opioid business.

The liability protection does not extend to criminal prosecutions.

In a statement in the report, two branches of the Sacklers did not acknowledge wrongdoing or any personal responsibility for the public health crisis. “While the families have acted lawfully in all respects, they sincerely regret that OxyContin, a prescription medicine that continues to help people suffering from chronic pain, unexpectedly became part of an opioid crisis that has brought grief and loss to far too many families and communities,” the statement read.

Though Purdue has pleaded guilty to criminal charges of misleading marketing and minimizing OxyContin’s risk of addiction, no individual Sackler has ever apologized or admitted wrongdoing. In August Dr. Richard Sackler, a former president and co-chairman of the board of Purdue, testified before Judge Drain that neither the family, the company nor its products bore any responsibility for the opioid epidemic.

“This settlement is both significant and insufficient — constrained by the inadequacies of our federal bankruptcy code,” said William Tong, the attorney general of Connecticut and a leader of the effort to wrest this latest offer from the Sacklers. “But Connecticut cannot stall this process indefinitely as victims and our sister states await a resolution. This settlement resolves our claims against Purdue and the Sacklers, but we are not done fighting for justice against the addiction industry and against our broken bankruptcy code.”

An overwhelming majority of states, local governments, tribes and individuals had already voted for an earlier settlement deal of $4.55 billion. But in December, a federal judge vacated that plan, questioning the legality of the protections from liability granted to the Sacklers. Corporate bankruptcy typically confers protection from lawsuits for the company that seeks restructuring, but it is unusual for the company’s owners to also get that shield if they did not file for personal bankruptcy as well.

Mediation talks between the eight holdout states and the District of Columbia and the Sacklers began soon after. To get the holdouts on board, the Sacklers had to agree to pay at least an additional $1 billion. Under the new deal, they will pay $5.5 billion, plus a contribution of up to $500 million, contingent on the sale of their international pharmaceutical companies.

After hundreds of hours of negotiations mediated by Judge Shelley Chapman of federal bankruptcy court, the Sacklers also agreed to a series of other new terms. In addition to the Sackler “statement,” which Mr. Tong characterized as an “apology,” Judge Chapman is recommending a hearing that would allow people who suffered from addiction to OxyContin to describe what they had endured, and that at least one Sackler family member from each of two branches attend. And if any medical centers and art or educational institutions bearing the Sackler name ask to have it removed, the Sacklers must acquiesce.

The new settlement, however, still faces two potential hurdles. Even if Judge Drain, the bankruptcy judge, signs off, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has to approve the plan, which would formally reverse the December ruling that rejected the earlier plan.

A key component of the deal — the immunity shield for the Sacklers from civil suits — is being contested by the U.S. Trustee program, which serves as a watchdog over the bankruptcy system. The Justice Department did not return a request for comment on whether it would continue to pursue that case.

Under the agreement, Purdue will be renamed Knoa Pharma and overseen by a public board. The restructured company will contribute $1.5 billion through 2024 to funds for the plaintiffs’ programs, plus more as the company evolves into a manufacturer of medications for addiction reversal and treatment, among other drugs, including OxyContin.

The Sacklers’ shield against lawsuits was the major sticking point for states that fought the plan. The District of Columbia and nine states — California, Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, New Hampshire, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington — had voted against the earlier proposal, contending they should have the right to pursue the Sacklers under state civil laws.

The earlier deal, which included a $225 million federal settlement, had less money but it was to be paid out over roughly nine years. The Sacklers now have 18 years to pay the additional $1 billion, according to the revised plan.

As marathon sessions of negotiations dragged on, the opioid crisis continued to deepen, with overdoses soaring during the pandemic. The dilemma for the holdout governments was whether to keep pursuing the Sacklers in court, a process that could take years with no guarantee of victory, or just take the money, now that the cash offer had increased.

While all the states and, in turn, their local governments, will get a bigger payout than the original deal outlined, the holdout states will get even more, as a bonus for their resistance. The $750 million set aside to compensate more than 100,000 individual victims and survivors and whose stories help build the governmental lawsuits will not grow, but states have committed to funding an “opioid survivors trust” specifically for them.

Ryan Hampton, who monitored the long proceedings on behalf of victims, said: “At least the $750 million is being protected which is better than no money at all. This bankruptcy needs to end. And the Justice Department needs to flex their muscle and investigate the Sacklers criminally, which is permissible under the bankruptcy plan.”

Adblock test (Why?)



"and" - Google News
March 03, 2022 at 11:26PM
https://ift.tt/gtiV1Qr

Sacklers and Purdue Reach Settlement as Opioids Crisis Continues - The New York Times
"and" - Google News
https://ift.tt/q3YafjE
https://ift.tt/pxeBk72
And

Bagikan Berita Ini

0 Response to "Sacklers and Purdue Reach Settlement as Opioids Crisis Continues - The New York Times"

Post a Comment


Powered by Blogger.